Thank you for your clarification Earl!
What do you think about chewing gum? Does it help to make the face appear wider? Is it legit?
I think gum chewing can help a bit but i think its mostly due to masseter muscle getting bigger. even so chewing gum wont do much imo, its a small firecracker compared to surgery which isa bomb. I chew mastic gum and do feel /think it makes my jaw look beter but its subjective and I have no real proof it is. There are also times pre gum I'd wake up in the morning and think i look a bit different for the better etc.
I think there might be somethin to the whole chewing thing in children. There seems to be good anecdotal evidence for that, however you never see what theyre parents look like. imo thats a big factor. sometimes growth in any part of the body can lag then catch up. This isnt facial related but my dentists told me he graduated high school with a height of 5'6 he figured he was done growing then all the sudden he had a growth spurt first year of college and is not 5'10. He def didnt take gh cause hes old, hes like in his late 70's.
I have yet to see any exaples even of kids where the kid is ugly, parents ugly then due to chewing or mewing or head gear etc become good looking. Not saying its not possible but I havent seen proof of that.
Also there are plenty of kids who grow up vegetarians eating hard vegetables etc and theyre still ugly. There are plenty of kids grow up on the standard american garbage diet and are still good looking. I always say this models in my age range 25-32 all grew up for the most part eating the same garbage every one else did yet their still good looking. I dont beleive its as simple as chewing or vitamin k2.
There seems to be an anti genetic backlash lately, where people are blaming the enviroment more than genetics, now yes over TIME enviroment can change genetics,but at this point whats done is done imo.
ALso I think some of these ppl are outright charletans. We live in 2017. It's actually farely easy to provide SOLID anecdotal evidence for these claims. Yes a full blind blind study is expensive and hard to do but solid anecdotal isnt.
Take NCR for example. I have had it. Im not sure it works. I thought i saw changes but didnt last. I had 3 session and stopped because of cost. my guy was on the cheaper side and a session of 4 inflations is still like 600 dollars. The "inventor" Dean Howell goes on about all these amazing things it can do but doesnt even provide basic basic anecdotal evidence that it actually moves the bones it claims to move and the face. Its very easy to provide solid anecdotal proof via scan. Take a guy , or if you want to argue not safe to do on a human then at least do it on a cadaver or animal (not trying to get into a animal rights argument) an do pre and post inflation cone beam scan or maybe even x-ray might show it. Also photos. He hastons of before and after photos all not showing much difference except for 1 guy who had like 50+ inflation, but evenc if i think i do see some small change its hard to tell because the photos have diff angles, lighting etc. Its 2017 , simply measure how far away from the subject your taking the pics in the before then repeat same distance in the after. same with lighting. Heck put a ruler or some type of measuring device neaRr the face in the sets of pics. Its not hard, its not perfect but it would be enough for me. I actually wanted to continue ncr to see if the changes i thought i saw in my forehead would last but i cant justify that type of money for an unproven thing. It concerns me that these guys dont want to provide some type of proof. That neymaj guy is just plain scary. obvious scammer .
