Author Topic: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation  (Read 3623 times)

Jilkster

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Karma: 0
Re: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2017, 10:59:28 PM »
When you read "FDA approved" don't immediately think they are talking about the USA FDA. Many other countries have analogous regulating agencies called the FDA, like thailand for example.

Because i took a 5 second look at their website and immediately spotted on the bottom: "Not for sale in the USA"

Very interesting, so question 1: What country's FDA approved it?

Lazlo

  • Private
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • Karma: 175
Re: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2017, 11:32:20 PM »
Seriously if it breaks you're f**ked.


Millis

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Karma: 6
Re: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation
« Reply #18 on: March 22, 2017, 07:59:41 AM »
Seems like a feasible alternative if CT-Bone fails to materialise, as unfortunately seems likely.

All we need to know, which surgeons will be performing these implants (in the midface) within the next year?

Jilkster

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Karma: 0
Re: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation
« Reply #19 on: March 22, 2017, 12:17:11 PM »
Seems like a feasible alternative if CT-Bone fails to materialise, as unfortunately seems likely.

All we need to know, which surgeons will be performing these implants (in the midface) within the next year?

Far from all we need to know, lol.

Jilkster

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
  • Karma: 0
Re: OssDsign-Personalized bioceramic implants for facial bone augmentation
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2017, 12:28:30 PM »
""Retrospective study data presented by OssDsign last year showed that after an average of 9.5 months, 96.7% of patients who received its implants were free from complications that necessitated implant removal.""

Still sounds high risk to me. Wonder how that number compares to other materials.