OK, lost track of what this was a response to but here goes:
Seems like he is telling people, 'no way he could own AMF', in the absence of his knowing some knew he was the CFO and owner of trademark.
You know one of the reasons people set up a corp is to differentiate personal income from corporate income where the corp is a different entity from the person. For example say a 'person' invests income (from job) into a corp he has set up. The 'person' could not get sued for a lot of $$ because the $$ is held in an 'entity', the corp.
Now as to his being the CFO of the corp, he could elect not to collect stock dividends but put them back into the corp. He could also elect to not pay himself a salary. Later down the line, he could cash in on it.
Now, I'm sure Italy is similar to US where setting up a corp is contingent on going in front of a notary public to VOW that the identities of the officers are who they say they are. It's not something you would do 'for a friend. He's from a long line of finance 'whizzes' certified CPAs I think. He would not be going in front of the Italian Chamber of Commerce to do this 'for a friend'. He would know better not to do that. So, it's just a cock and bull story he set it up 'for a friend', a cock and bull story to those who MIGHT believe it.
The set up of the corp is most likely one where when payment or 'income' comes in, expenses that went into generating the income are deducted and profits in terms of 'owners equity' (stocks) go back into the corp if the chief stock holders (his owning about 85% of the shares) elect not to cash in the dividends but instead re-invest in the corp.
Lets take the example where the CFO of the corp; 'RealTconsulting...' who owns AMF has some 'expenses' associated with the aim of this corp (one in the biz aesthetic surgery). So, any aesthetic service he gets for himself, he can deduct as an 'expense' of the corp. He could elect to generate a bunch of losses for a while if he wanted.
If he has a history and pattern of HIDING disclosure to mods and also history of coming up with some cock and bull story once HOLES are found in a past story, the more holes found, the more he's going to be coming up with a better cock and bull story to patch up the holes. I would just leave it as that he's been at this for years, he's hid disclosure for years, he knows how to come up with some story when he's caught and I would not be expecting any 'forthright' or 'on the level' answers to any more questions asked of him.
I think the best that can be done is to keep him off some boards and to disclose to members what he has devoted himself to hiding from them as to the way he has gone about using/abusing message boards as opportunistic venues for members to 'find out' about this 'service' by virtue (or is that vice?) of cloak and dagger infiltration.
Might not be a bad idea to ISOLATE him and his to lookism where then it's their problem. I think Google socked them for having a bunch of 'jail bait' stuff on there where they are having hard time generating advertising revenue. So, let them lose even more potential advertising revenue from the goldmine he must get from there pretending he's not promoting his own product.
