But that's how it should be, no?
They have the rarer gamete.
The prescriptive "should" is pretty dubious here. That's the naturalistic fallacy. Female selectivity was important to the evolution of the species, but we've overcome those evolutionary pressures with modern technology (birth control, abortion, in-vitro fertilization).
We can explain WHY women are the selectors, but that doesn't tell us anything about what SHOULD be. Not that it can be changed anyway.
I'd add though that not all women get attention and / or positive attention from men. I have been fortunate in this respect and it has not happened to me (yet), but I hear from others that for example overweight women, or women above a certain age become completely invisible to men or even get ridiculed.
Yes, this is very true. The red pill types refer to this as The Wall. It's an inflection point at which women's attractiveness typically begins to decrease. The most commonly proposed number is about 30, but this of course depends on the woman. Red pillers often refer to women as "pre-wall" or "post-wall". A post-wall or overweight woman is likely to have a more similar experience to an average young man.
Men, on the other hand, have the potential to become more attractive with age. Maturity, wealth, and power are all attractive to women. If you take care of your body, it's possible to keep building muscle through your 30s as well. Especially with the power of testosterone replacement therapy.
