jawsurgeryforums.com

General Category => Aesthetics => Topic started by: eastcoastian1 on December 29, 2021, 11:06:56 AM

Title: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on December 29, 2021, 11:06:56 AM
Hi all,

Getting closer to pulling the trigger on removal of implants+jaw surgery. My surgeon just sent me his surgical plan. I have a meeting with him in a few weeks to talk it through but in the mean time, wondering if you guys could take a look and give me your thoughts.

I have to say, it seems much more conservative than I thought. He told me the movements mimic my implants, but I see only a 4mm genioplasty and 4mm mandible movement with little to no CCW rotation (the occlusal plane is still very steep?)

https://imgur.com/a/wDuED5Y
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: GJ on December 29, 2021, 02:38:46 PM
I think you could benefit from a little CCW based on those photos.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on December 29, 2021, 02:59:04 PM
The 'max bite pitch' is the maxillary occlusal plane. (An asterisk * beside a measure means measure is in DEGREES; an angle). So, the plan conveys the OP is to be changed to a LESSER angle that is within the norm. (9.1 deg. is within a norm of 8 deg with 2 deg standard deviations.). Since decreasing the angle of inclination of the OP is in direction of CCW, CCW is being done.
The plan says the angle change is -2.5 which means decrease of the OP and hence it is CCW.

ANB= SNA-SNB (subtraction of angles). So, the changes of SNA and SNB, together bring you closer to the norm for ANB.

It does look with aim to replace implants as close as possible but also bring you closer to the norm as to angle relationships. Also because some of the GAP changes differ on each side of the mandible, maybe to relieve some stresses to the joint/s or just to even some parts of it out that the BSSO doesn't change. Kind of looks like a 'reverse L' osteotomy is to be done on mandible (part of it shown in green) under section called; 'Mandible Gaps'.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on December 29, 2021, 03:18:33 PM
The 'max bite pitch' is the maxillary occlusal plane. (An asterisk * beside a measure means measure is in DEGREES; an angle). So, the plan conveys the OP is to be changed to a LESSER angle that is within the norm. (9.1 deg. is within a norm of 8 deg with 2 deg standard deviations.). Since decreasing the angle of inclination of the OP is in direction of CCW, CCW is being done.

ANB= SNA-SNB (subtraction of angles). So, the changes of SNA and SNB, together bring you closer to the norm for ANB.

It does look with aim to replace implants as close as possible but also bring you closer to the norm as to angle relationships. Also because some of the GAP changes differ on each side of the mandible, maybe to relieve some stresses to the joint/s or just to even some parts of it out that the BSSO doesn't change. Kind of looks like a 'reverse L' osteotomy is to be done on mandible (part of it shown in green) under section called; 'Mandible Gaps'.

I suppose then I’m just wondering, why would the surgeon not rotate the jaws to be level instead of still having the downward slope. Doing something similar to below:

https://i0.wp.com/entokey.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/f057-002-9780323443395.jpg?zoom=3&w=960
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on December 29, 2021, 04:48:13 PM
I suppose then I’m just wondering, why would the surgeon not rotate the jaws to be level instead of still having the downward slope. Doing something similar to below:

https://i0.wp.com/entokey.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/f057-002-9780323443395.jpg?zoom=3&w=960

 Let me get this straight are you actually asking why the surgeon doesn't do something to DECREASE your facial height when your objective is to have the surgery get as close to what the implants did which was to INCREASE your facial height? I mean the OBVIOUS thing to observe in the low angle OP photo was the facial height was decreased.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on December 29, 2021, 04:54:39 PM
Let me get this straight are you actually asking why the surgeon doesn't do something to DECREASE your facial height when your objective is to have the surgery get as close to what the implants did which was to INCREASE your facial height? I mean the OBVIOUS thing to observe in the low angle OP photo was the facial height was decreased.

Right, my face definitely looks shorter without the implants. They absolutely added height to the lower third which was what was needed. I just had thought if you do a CCW rotation with a posterior downgraft, you can both level the occlusal plane while at the same time helping adding some length, which as you mentioned is needed too.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on December 29, 2021, 06:41:06 PM
Right, my face definitely looks shorter without the implants. They absolutely added height to the lower third which was what was needed. I just had thought if you do a CCW rotation with a posterior downgraft, you can both level the occlusal plane while at the same time helping adding some length, which as you mentioned is needed too.

That's not how it works. The read-outs tell you that facial height is the distance from N to Me which is distance from nasion to base of chin and or distance from ANS to base of chin which is the facial height you wanted the implants to increase (anterior facial height).

The photo diagram in your link clearly conveys the extent of CCW to make OP almost flat DECREASED anterior facial height.

Conclusion: Something that has the effect of DECREASING the ANTERIOR facial height (significant CCW) is ? :

a: What to do for someone who had implants to INCREASE their anterior facial height
b: What NOT to do for someone who had implants to increase their anterior facial height

Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on December 29, 2021, 08:36:06 PM
That's not how it works. The read-outs tell you that facial height is the distance from N to Me which is distance from nasion to base of chin and or distance from ANS to base of chin which is the facial height you wanted the implants to increase (anterior facial height).

The photo diagram in your link clearly conveys the extent of CCW to make OP almost flat DECREASED anterior facial height.

Conclusion: Something that has the effect of DECREASING the ANTERIOR facial height (significant CCW) is ? :

a: What to do for someone who had implants to INCREASE their anterior facial height
b: What NOT to do for someone who had implants to increase their anterior facial height

I guess my mind is just a bit blown right now. All these years, I thought for SURE, my steep mandibular/occlusal plane means I needed a CCW rotation to flatten and bring everything level. I just assumed that this could be done without shortening the face overall.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on December 30, 2021, 06:37:05 PM
I guess my mind is just a bit blown right now. All these years, I thought for SURE, my steep mandibular/occlusal plane means I needed a CCW rotation to flatten and bring everything level. I just assumed that this could be done without shortening the face overall.

Well see if you can improve your thinking process. That's what I look for when I address questions; did the person learn anything. You didn't answer the simple question I asked in my last post:

 Something that has the effect of DECREASING the ANTERIOR facial height (significant CCW) is ? :

a: What to do for someone who had implants to INCREASE their anterior facial height
b: What NOT to do for someone who had implants to increase their anterior facial height
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on December 30, 2021, 07:37:23 PM
Well see if you can improve your thinking process. That's what I look for when I address questions; did the person learn anything. You didn't answer the simple question I asked in my last post:

 Something that has the effect of DECREASING the ANTERIOR facial height (significant CCW) is ? :

a: What to do for someone who had implants to INCREASE their anterior facial height
b: What NOT to do for someone who had implants to increase their anterior facial height

Sorry didn’t know you were legitimately asking.

Well the answer I would think is B then if it’s a given that significant CCW would decrease facial height. I thought this was the case when only doing anterior impaction with the CCW. If you do posterior downgraft and no anterior impaction, the face wouldn’t get shorter.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on December 30, 2021, 07:55:37 PM
CCW, either kind, (as a function of the extent of it) can shorten anterior facial height.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on February 10, 2022, 12:31:26 PM
Update!

Braces are on and the journey has officially started. Wish me luck!

Hopefully the movements will suffice enough where I won't need another implant, but worst case, I'll just throw a couple of custom ones back at the angles if needed.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: thedude on February 19, 2022, 03:44:28 AM
I suppose then I’m just wondering, why would the surgeon not rotate the jaws to be level instead of still having the downward slope.

In general from what I have been able to tell a flat occlusal plane is not the aesthetic ideal. You want a slight downward slope just like you have. You’ll even notice if you study other mammals most of them have a slight downward slope to their jaws.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on March 03, 2022, 08:52:33 AM
After just two months of decompensation, it’s really showing just how bad my jaw really is even WITH my implants. Feeling better and better about my decision to do surgery.

https://imgur.com/a/wzrXbMc
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 18, 2022, 09:39:20 AM
One month out from surgery guys. Plan is:

- Bimax
- Genio
- Small CCW with posterior downgraft
- NEW angle implants

Starting to get major cold feet though after reading so many people with permanent numbness and nerve damage.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: GJ on August 18, 2022, 10:00:20 AM
Starting to get major cold feet though after reading so many people with permanent numbness and nerve damage.

Well it is a legitimate concern and risk. Only you can weigh that.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 18, 2022, 11:09:30 AM
Well it is a legitimate concern and risk. Only you can weigh that.

Yeah….especially aesthetically I’m not that bad. Having a hard time deciding if it’s worth it or not.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: GJ on August 18, 2022, 01:15:36 PM
Yeah….especially aesthetically I’m not that bad. Having a hard time deciding if it’s worth it or not.

Cases like this are only obvious in retrospect.

I mean, you are a bit recessed and could look quite a bit better if things go well, but I'm not sure the probability on that. It's a lot of things that have to go well. With a good surgeon probably 60/40 in your favor. But if things go badly, it will be, "what was I thinking, I was fine, etc"...

Some cases are very obvious and those people have easier decisions. I think class 2 with mild to moderate recession are some of the most difficult cases to figure out the risk/reward. It's why I usually tell people (opinion of course) not to do it for only aesthetics but you have to get some functional benefit from it.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 18, 2022, 01:40:23 PM
Cases like this are only obvious in retrospect.

I mean, you are a bit recessed and could look quite a bit better if things go well, but I'm not sure the probability on that. It's a lot of things that have to go well. With a good surgeon probably 60/40 in your favor. But if things go badly, it will be, "what was I thinking, I was fine, etc"...

Some cases are very obvious and those people have easier decisions. I think class 2 with mild to moderate recession are some of the most difficult cases to figure out the risk/reward. It's why I usually tell people (opinion of course) not to do it for only aesthetics but you have to get some functional benefit from it.

Yep. I’m really struggling with it. Feels like for every one person that had a comparable treatment who thought it was worth it, there’s another person who says it was the biggest mistake of their life.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: ChinaBoy420 on August 19, 2022, 08:41:47 PM
Let me get this straight are you actually asking why the surgeon doesn't do something to DECREASE your facial height when your objective is to have the surgery get as close to what the implants did which was to INCREASE your facial height? I mean the OBVIOUS thing to observe in the low angle OP photo was the facial height was decreased.
I am very new to jaw surgery. But am I right to say that CCWr with posterior downgrafting (no impaction) will lengthen the face to a significant degree if the OP is very steep?
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on August 20, 2022, 10:53:49 AM
I am very new to jaw surgery. But am I right to say that CCWr with posterior downgrafting (no impaction) will lengthen the face to a significant degree if the OP is very steep?

It would tend towards decreasing the anterior facial height. Relationships in Jaw surgery relate to relationships in elementary geometry. So, prior familiarity with basic geometrical concepts is needed to have underbelt in order to relate to the relationships going on with such things as the rotation of a triangle on which the concept of CCW-r via posterior downgrafting is based.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: GJ on August 22, 2022, 03:17:48 PM
I am very new to jaw surgery. But am I right to say that CCWr with posterior downgrafting (no impaction) will lengthen the face to a significant degree if the OP is very steep?

No that's not right. It's the opposite.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 26, 2022, 01:16:29 PM
Small update here. I had a consult with Dr. Posnick (who’s retired) and he said I was basically bat s**t crazy for even considering jaw surgery and that I would almost assuredly regret it.

Ugh
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: GJ on August 26, 2022, 02:32:56 PM
Small update here. I had a consult with Dr. Posnick (who’s retired) and he said I was basically bat s**t crazy for even considering jaw surgery and that I would almost assuredly regret it.

Ugh

What was his reasoning?
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 26, 2022, 02:53:29 PM
What was his reasoning?

Aesthetically I will look way way worse taking out the implants I currently have (which he says looks great and are stable) in exchange for a proper bite. He said if I wood have had jaw surgery in the first place then did implants it would be a different story, but at this point, I would be making an “irreversible mistake” esthetically speaking if I were to do this and expect to look as good or better as now. 

Don’t know what to do. So much anxiety and I’m a month from surgery….
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on August 27, 2022, 12:15:18 PM
Assuming the maxfax surgery is CONTINGENT on removing the implants to do it, it's  only an 'irreversible mistake' IF the the maxfax surgery PRECLUDES putting in another set of implants down the line. Did you ask YOUR surgeon whether or not his surgery would actually preclude you from getting a new set of implants later down the line if yours need to be removed?

I would suggest discussing your apprehensions with the doctor you booked surgery with. That is preferable to gathering extraneous information from OTHER sources, especially since you have already gone through the decompensation process to prepare for a surgery.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: eastcoastian1 on August 27, 2022, 02:48:52 PM
Assuming the maxfax surgery is CONTINGENT on removing the implants to do it, it's  only an 'irreversible mistake' IF the the maxfax surgery PRECLUDES putting in another set of implants down the line. Did you ask YOUR surgeon whether or not his surgery would actually preclude you from getting a new set of implants later down the line if yours need to be removed?

I would suggest discussing your apprehensions with the doctor you booked surgery with. That is preferable to gathering extraneous information from OTHER sources, especially since you have already gone through the decompensation process to prepare for a surgery.

Hi Kavan.

Surgery is with Dr. Sullivan btw.

Yes decompensation has been a pain and would be for nothing if I abandon now.

Part of the surgery plan is not only remove my current implant but also REPLACE it when new custom gonial angle PEEK implants during surgery. Even he admits if I take my implant out and just do the BiMax, I’m gonna look pretty bad.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: kavan on August 27, 2022, 09:01:43 PM
So, if Sullivan is REPLACING them and he knows you would look bad WITHOUT replacing them, then you should know Posnik's comments were EXTRANEOUS.
Title: Re: Surgical Plan Review
Post by: ChinaBoy420 on August 29, 2022, 10:42:22 PM
No that's not right. It's the opposite.
Hmm that is interesting. In some videos I see like the ones I attached below the skull gets longer vertically (distance from chin to top of head) after CCWr.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CL7kp89giZx/?hl=en