Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Aesthetics / Re: Need Advice for Optimizing Face
« Last post by kavan on April 29, 2024, 07:55:18 PM »
Thank you very much for the thorough response.

Is there any way to do the jaw surgery I would need, that you suggest, without braces?  Or could it be done with invisalign or a similar solution?  Or if braces were absolutely required, what is the shortest amount of time I could have them?

If not, is there any way to replicate (even if not fully) the aesthetic results I would get from your suggested procedure with implants and/or other alternatives?

Braces can take over a year to get the teeth prepared for the jaw displacements in a maxfax surgery. They are needed to 'decompensate' a bite (to UNDO the present bite to prepare for future bite with jaw movements). Only an ortho who works with a surgeon could tell you how long or if invisalign. The nose and it's lack of maxillary support is key problem. Although there are implants that go under the nose base to project out the base of the nose, it doesn't hurt to consult with a maxfax surgeon about rotations along with advancements.

2
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by kavan on April 29, 2024, 04:56:21 PM »
Thank you for your thoughts Kavan !

I have more to say but time's short and I'm in the middle of writing a paper for university. I'll come back to your comment when I'm done with my essay.

In the event I'm not around, I'll provide some more info that could explain why the guy hesitates to offer surgery. I'll also provide a diagram having to do with rotations.


1: The angle of inclination the lower incisor has with the border of the mandible looks to exceed 95 degrees. It's not uncommon for prior ortho to get 'bite rite' by flaring out the upper and lower incisors which might contribute to the lip 'stick out'. I don't remember the exact angle but just to say the maxfax docs like it to be near range of 90 to 95 degrees and not overly obtuse. So, maybe he doesn't want to pluck a pre-molar which would be needed to get the lower incisor with in the range of inclination they like it to have when doing an advancement.

2: Although the lip 'stickout' is made less and re-orients to rotate down and backward with CW-r, lack of tooth show along with complaint of lower face too short would require an OVERALL down graft (one to the entire maxilla) with net CW-r. Thing is that an overall down graft to ELONGATE the maxilla is not something all surgeons do (advanced skill set is needed). Just sayin' for short lower '1/3rd' and lack of upper tooth show, a down graft that spans the entire maxilla is needed. So, you would have to establish if he actually does them. By the way, an overall maxillary downgraft to increase the height of lower face can have net CW-R, net CCW-r or 0 net rotation if length of it is uniform throughout span of maxilla. When the front of it is longer than the back of it, it's net CW-r and when the back of it is longer than the front, it's net CCW-r. But no matter the rotation, what the grafts have in common is LENGTH added to lower 3rd of face. Monkey muzzle (chimp lip) has more to do advancing over an unfavorable rotation when they advance both the jaw and maxilla equally where they have to advance the maxilla TOO MUCH to because they DON'T do a CCW-r in a person who could need that in order to have the mandible advanced more than the maxilla. So, it's more of a matter of an equal advancement of both jaws in people who start with an unfavorable inherent rotation of the jaws which is not changed (via rotation) before hand. So, chimp lip is neither directly associated with CW-r or CCW-r pe se. It's directly associated with MORE advancement of the maxilla than a person might need when a doctor advances both jaws equally (linear advancement) to get a large mandible advancement and the maxilla goes along with the same ride.

3: Another thing that needs a graft of sorts is a genio that goes in the direction of downward and outward. It makes a bone GAP than needs to be filled in with a graft. So, maybe he doesn't do the type of grafts other docs do

4: Depending on how much you conveyed to the doctor that your bone structure was not as 'robust' as you would like,maybe he thought you were expecting too much from maxfax surgery. Bimax/double jaw surgery will do nothing for cheek bones. Although they can vertically elongate the maxilla for a longer lower 'third' of the face, they can't make the jaw bone itself more robust. That is to say, it doesn't actually make a vertically short mandibular body longer or more 'hefty'.

All that said, I think it could be a combination of your expecting to get a more 'robust' bone structure from maxfax surgery and also, possibility of pre-molar removal and also a question of whether or not he performs the type of BONE GRAFTING techniques associated with maxilla elongation and also a type of genio that goes down and outward also needing bone grafting. Like it sounds more in that direction than in direction of getting 'chimp lip'. I'm not predicting whether you could or could not get chimp lip. Just saying, I don't think that possibility is the salient reason for his being disinclined to encourage surgery.

3
Aesthetics / Re: Need Advice for Optimizing Face
« Last post by LCM9001 on April 29, 2024, 03:53:18 PM »
You have the type of profile that IMO that would benefit from double jaw surgery with clockwise rotation. Maxilla advancement would give better support to the base of your nose which looks collapsed due to lack maxillary support. You have short chin and a low mandibular plane angle. So, double jaw advancement in your case would look better with CW-r. However, you've ruled that out because it is something that requires braces to prepare for.

I'll repeat what I said in another post where person had somewhat similar profile as yours: "Double jaw advancement with clockwise rotation around the ANS point. CW-r around the ANS point will bring PNS up, push the chin point backwards and down. Soft tissue of the lips will go backwards and soft tissue at chin will go backwards and down. So, with the CW-r, it tends to reduce the type of 'stick out' you have with the lips. It also increases your LOW Mandibular plane angle and sets the chin point downwards so it doesn't look so short. CW-r is backwards and down and that is the best rotation to have (in your case) for the double jaw advancement."

In the event you would like to consider/consult about double jaw surgery (which requires time in braces), I'm just giving you a 'heads up' on what the maxfax doc might suggest for improvement. I don't think you have enough BASE OF THE NOSE SUPPORT (maxillary support) to risk another failed rhino and I think your rhino failures may have been attributed to lack of maxillary support in the first place.

Thank you very much for the thorough response.

Is there any way to do the jaw surgery I would need, that you suggest, without braces?  Or could it be done with invisalign or a similar solution?  Or if braces were absolutely required, what is the shortest amount of time I could have them?

If not, is there any way to replicate (even if not fully) the aesthetic results I would get from your suggested procedure with implants and/or other alternatives?
4
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by VainVanVeen on April 29, 2024, 02:04:40 PM »
Thank you for your thoughts Kavan !

I have more to say but time's short and I'm in the middle of writing a paper for university. I'll come back to your comment when I'm done with my essay.
5
Aesthetics / Re: Need Advice for Optimizing Face
« Last post by kavan on April 28, 2024, 07:15:33 PM »
You have the type of profile that IMO that would benefit from double jaw surgery with clockwise rotation. Maxilla advancement would give better support to the base of your nose which looks collapsed due to lack maxillary support. You have short chin and a low mandibular plane angle. So, double jaw advancement in your case would look better with CW-r. However, you've ruled that out because it is something that requires braces to prepare for.

I'll repeat what I said in another post where person had somewhat similar profile as yours: "Double jaw advancement with clockwise rotation around the ANS point. CW-r around the ANS point will bring PNS up, push the chin point backwards and down. Soft tissue of the lips will go backwards and soft tissue at chin will go backwards and down. So, with the CW-r, it tends to reduce the type of 'stick out' you have with the lips. It also increases your LOW Mandibular plane angle and sets the chin point downwards so it doesn't look so short. CW-r is backwards and down and that is the best rotation to have (in your case) for the double jaw advancement."

In the event you would like to consider/consult about double jaw surgery (which requires time in braces), I'm just giving you a 'heads up' on what the maxfax doc might suggest for improvement. I don't think you have enough BASE OF THE NOSE SUPPORT (maxillary support) to risk another failed rhino and I think your rhino failures may have been attributed to lack of maxillary support in the first place.
6
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by kavan on April 28, 2024, 06:37:39 PM »
My guess would be Double jaw advancement with clockwise rotation around the ANS point. CW-r around the ANS point will bring PNS up, push the chin point backwards and down. Soft tissue of the lips will go backwards and soft tissue at chin will go backwards and down. So, with the CW-r, it tends to reduce the type of 'stick out' you have with the lips. It also increases your LOW Mandibular plane angle and sets the chin point downwards so it doesn't look so short. CW-r is backwards and down and that is the best rotation to have (in your case) for the double jaw advancement.
7
Aesthetics / Re: Need Advice for Optimizing Face
« Last post by LCM9001 on April 28, 2024, 04:39:51 PM »
I think adding a bit of chin height would not be a bad idea. You don't really need it, but I can see why you would want it given you have a short face. The problem is that labio-mental grove is already pretty deep, and it will get deeper, so you need to discuss how that will be handled if you do go that route. Regarding jaw surgery...I mean, no. But I can see someone thinking you need clockwise rotation to lengthen your face. I don't think so, but that's a purely aesthetic/preference thing, and I personally I couldn't see doing surgery for that. Specifically: my concern would be chimp lip, and I also think you'd run into problems regarding the nose. Expect 1-2mm of widening if you move the upper jaw. Given you had so much nose work done already, I'd be super skeptical that would turn out well. I'll email you one more note.

I appreciate you taking a look and posting your thoughts.

If I were to get a genio for added height, what would I need to do in order to avoid any issues with the labiomental area?

I've thought about paranasal/midface implant to reduce the nasolabial folds.  Any thoughts on that?
8
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by GJ on April 28, 2024, 08:32:47 AM »
From the documents they gave me about the genioplasty, there is mention of titanium plates but nothing about paste or the likes. I asked them if they could do the type of genioplasty where they widen the chin by cutting and putting a bone graft in the cut, they said no. So I'm not certain about them using something for the groove except the plates and screws. In any case, I'll ask them.

You might want to go on more consults, too.
9
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by VainVanVeen on April 28, 2024, 08:19:42 AM »
From the documents they gave me about the genioplasty, there is mention of titanium plates but nothing about paste or the likes. I asked them if they could do the type of genioplasty where they widen the chin by cutting and putting a bone graft in the cut, they said no. So I'm not certain about them using something for the groove except the plates and screws. In any case, I'll ask them.
10
Aesthetics / Re: Happy to hear your opinions
« Last post by GJ on April 28, 2024, 08:03:10 AM »
Thank you for answering !

About the fat, I've already tried. I could probably be a little bit leaner (as I've already been), but I'm already pretty lean (I know most people say this and it's easy to say) : this is the only part of my body that's mostly like this.

I see what you mean about the philtrum, the lip curve was throwing me off. Thanks for the observation.

Do you think advancing the chin and giving it some height would be a good idea, like a kind of middle ground procedure ? Is the labiomental fold a worry here ?

Thanks again

To me that's a good compromise (in theory), but only if they can fill the groove with something (HA, bone, etc) to tame the shadow. You already have a deep groove, and a genio might make a step there in addition to a deeper groove. Your tissue looks thick on that ceph, so I'd think you'd need a bigger bone movement to move that soft tissue. Probably like 6mm of bone to get 2 or 3 of soft tissue? I'm not sure exactly, obviously. But ask about all that and how they'd fill the groove/shadow, and also ask if it would create any step off.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10