Author Topic: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?  (Read 7224 times)

MrFox

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Karma: 21
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #30 on: December 16, 2016, 01:42:40 PM »
Listen, if you're willing to not engage in contact sports then the CT Bone looks okay. Also, in that video on this thread it actually says the CT bone will turnover with the metabolic cycle of the patient meaning it really does turn into real bone. So I mean hey that's our answer.

Let's proceed with CT Bone as the solution! Long live the new flesh!

Yes it definitely sounds like the best solution 👍

Lazlo

  • Private
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • Karma: 174
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #31 on: December 16, 2016, 02:06:18 PM »
Yes it definitely sounds like the best solution 👍

I agree, so let's now push for more information and finding when it will be available. The asset to this method is the implants can be custom designed to fit.

Lazlo

  • Private
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • Karma: 174
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #32 on: December 16, 2016, 02:27:56 PM »
Honestly, I want a solution that will address the underlying skeletal problem as soon as possible.

I don't want to spend the rest of my life waiting for more answers.

MrFox

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Karma: 21
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #33 on: December 16, 2016, 03:02:16 PM »
I will do everything that I can to help find when this will be available, but perhaps the company doesn't know themselves yet.

Lazlo

  • Private
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • Karma: 174
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #34 on: December 16, 2016, 05:54:54 PM »
anyone know if you can stack the CT 'bone' on top of each other for larger augmentations? With silicone its not a problem because it is flexible but the CT bone is rigid so you can't do 'extreme augmentations' (if your one of the few unfortunate people who legitimately need an extreme augmentation to make a difference)

CT Bone is designed to the specifications you want. So if you want an extreme augmentation you just request for one to be 3-D printed I'm assuming. It seems to me you'd be able to do the most extreme augmentations you want with this product. It's customized to your requriements.

Lestat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
  • Karma: 80
  • Gender: Male
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #35 on: December 17, 2016, 06:59:17 AM »
Imo CT Bone is failed.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2016, 07:08:51 AM by Lestat »

Lestat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 577
  • Karma: 80
  • Gender: Male
Re: What is the current state of Xilloc-CT Bone?
« Reply #36 on: December 27, 2016, 12:06:43 PM »
Did anyone see pics in Sinn's office of his modified LF3's?

Yes Lazlo did.

Now let me tell you he showed me one patient —not Earl, but someone more recent who had the “modified lefort-3” yes there was a difference but it just resembled a weak ZSO to me. In fact, when I studied the before and after profiles there was no significant augmentation to the area directly beneath the eye and this was not as augmented as when I see Dr. Yaremchuck’s examples of orbital rim implants with “canthopexy” no Sir, not even close. Honestly from the example of the modified lefort 3 I saw this procedure is not the holy grail to your looks as many of you have been assuming I’m very sorry to report and I don’t think it can do a lot at all. You’re like to get a much more dramatic result from a genioplasty to your appearance. The problem I think rests in the facts that the movement isn’t that much AND you’re limited by your own anatomy. If you don’t have large bones they’re not gonna show very well. Also, even though this is supposedly moving the orbital rim, what is needed is more augmentation to the rim height and width itself I think.