Nope. She looks perfectly normal and does not need more all over her face. Very minor amounts in selected areas, I would say, which makes her no different to most people. And that can effectively be achieved with temp fillers. IMO, it's not very helpful to put forward that view before saying "nothing to be done about it".
As for the genio. I can't see your x-rays - did you have the diagonally cut genio mentioned by Kavan, or was a different type of cut used?
If it was the latter, I suspect revision options might be limited, unless it can be re-cut diagonally?
Well sounds like I'm digging a deeper hole with my opinions on this board. I think she looks good, perfectly normal, and doesn't need anything tbh. I made this clear I felt like. Still, 'good' is a relative sentiment. Many will still look for problems or be more critical of themselves, especially after a change like jaw surgery.
To have the mentality that there HAS to be a solution now I think is a mistake many people on this board are prone to. I have done a massive amount of research on soft tissue fillers of all kinds, and I wouldn't recommend them to anyone who is very critical of themselves. It is risky regardless of the permanence of the procedure. If you study aging and volume loss, you will understand that a targeted approach to fillers is flawed. Many people end up looking slightly unnatural and regret it over time.
I do think an ideal solution to soft tissue regeneration is on the horizon - so to say that my stance is: 'nothing to be done about it' also isn't totally accurate. Anyway, not trying to be overly aggressive, I honestly just want to get the information I've learned out there so people don't do things they'd regret!
