So you go to any f**king PS or max fac or realself sight and research cheekbone augmentation or zygoma, malar etc. (without implants) and all you get is f**king radio silence.
I've seen one mention of Dr. Anthony S Wolfe. Dr. Sinn was unheard of till what's his name found him and even then b*tches he was the first guy to ever get that surgery --it was the first one Dr. SInn did and just sort of made up how to do it.
So what I'm saying is, except for the dude who get ZSO in Berlin (which by the way do f**k all for your cheekbones or your orbital rims so basically are useless) --NO BODY DOES ANYTHING IN A REGULAR PREDICTIBLE FASHION FOR CHEEKBONES. SO WE"RE f**kED. NOBODY FIXES THIS s**t. What I mean to say is there's no expertise in it either and so nobody does anythign regularly. I doubt Wolfe has done more than a handful. And guess what, Sinn has done only 2.
So why the f**k are you haters still believing this procedure is something that is possible or done?
Lazlo,
No consistency in an outcome ie. the OUTPUT can be expected when the INPUT varies greatly from individual to individual.
Think very very basic scientific high school chemistry experiment. For everyone to get the SAME result; such that the OUTCOMES of the experiment are CONSISTANT, the same chemicals, amount of them, mixture of them, time on bunson burner etc have to be used.
In terms of very very basic scientific thought, one would not even EXPECT 'consistency' regarding the aesthetic outcomes of different individuals getting the same aesthetic procedure where the inputs had so much variance. The expectation would be INCONSISTENCY.
The output (results) would be 'inconsistent' because the input (start point) will vary from person to person. In terms of VARIANCE of facial bone structure, EXTERNAL facial bones that also make up part of the INTERNAL eye orbit vary the MOST and BECAUSE external facial structure is CONTINGENT on the growth direction going on in the INTERNAL orbit, one can't expect 'consistency' regarding an external aesthetic result. Since the zygomatic bone is part of the INTERNAL eye orbit, it's EXTERNAL orientation will be a FUNCTION of it's INTERNAL orientation. Not only that, it's connected to other facial bones in the internal orbit, eg. maxilla, frontal where the maxilla is is the most complex facial bone in terms of shape and also shape variance from person to person.
In a bone cutting cheek procedure or even one with implants the displacements will be made to the EXTERNAL part of the bone. So, the changes you see with the procedure will be relative to the INTERNAL eye socket; the bone orientation within. If the bone growth directions and orientation within the INTERNAL eye socket 'are what they are', the EXTERNAL outcome will be 'what it is'.