I bet orthodontists and even surgeons are trained, or maybe they probably learn through experience, to use language carefully. If my ortho advises me to get a revision because my bite is not perfect, and then I suffer nerve damage in my upper lip, and I later find out my bite was “good enough” and there was no revision that NEEDED to be done, he would be screwed and potentially liable to lawsuit.
So instead of saying directly “you have a transverse deficiency,” they might say “I know YOU have concerns about the transverse.” That way they can never be accused of leading the patient, only responding to the patient.
True. That goes more or less for any kind of business, but even more for this kind of stuff with high risks.
Though in the end, it doesn't really matter. Either someone has the skill or he doesn't. And you just don't know beforehand if someone has it or not. And even if someone has the skills, it doesn't exclude the fact that even the best can make a mistake, or that his aestethic view doesn't correspond with that of the client. In a sense, beauty is subjective. A surgeon might be satisfied with a result, while a client is not. Fact is, some surgeons are better than others. I would say, based on experience: 90 percent are s**t, only 10 percent are good, but every one of them think they are the best.