They finally replied to my old email i sent them;
One of the major drawbacks of solid silicon implants are bone erosion and long term risk of inflammation and implant rejection, what kind of improvement could we really expect from CT-Bone regarding this?
Inflammation and rejection is always a risk when implanting something. Even when they use the patients own bone, infection or rejection can happen. CT-Bone is a more bone like material, whereas silicon is really a foreign material, so I guess our odds are better.
How realistic is your early 2016 EU- release? Should we start getting our hopes up just yet?
We are still on schedule for an early 2016 EU-release.
Would these implants be more surgically challenging to place then ordinary silicon implants? If so, will it be problematic to seek out surgeons capable of installing them?
If anything, it should be easier; we make the implants custom-made, so they should fit perfectly on the bone. Silicon implants are never adopted to the shape of the bone by my knowing. Although I can imagine that because silicon is flexible it can be squeezed through a certain incision, whereas CT-Bone is solid and the incision should be large enough. No squeezing possible. Still I think there is a different purpose: CT-Bone aims to create skeletal symmetry, whereas silicon is used more to achieve soft-tissue symmetry. They will probably co-exist.
What price bracket will CT-Bone be located in? New technology is always more expensive, how affordable will CT-bone be compared to custom -made solid silicon implants?
I don’t know yet what custom-silicon implants cost. Ballpark figure: I expect facial CT-Bone implants to be between 4.000 and 10.000 €. Is that affordable in your opinion? Maybe I should ask your audience what they would be willing to pay.