Double jaw forward advancement with ccw, genio, rhinoplasty, onlay augmentation to cheeks and jaw, face and neck lifting and some PHOTO SHOP.
Yes. It's clearly more than just a face lift to THIS audience on a JAW SURGERY board. But his calling it a 'face lift' would not be clear to many others looking for a face lift but who were not familiar or directly pursuing bone cutting maxfax surgery with facial implant augmentation.
The fact that you HAD TO ASK what she had means that he failed to CLEARLY disclose ALL the procedures she had and uses a form of TRICKERY in his presentation.
In my opinion, he's a deceptive doctor who (Swiss) BANKS on such duplicity not being detected by those he's wanting to dupe by it.
Take for example the twist of words: "In the method developed by Professor Sailer,......This unique operation......." The claim is that he 'developed a face lifting' method that is 'unique'. Well, he didn't develop methods used in MAXFAX surgery with face implants, genios and rhinos, ect. Another example is saying this 'FACELIFT' (performed under general anesthesia) is 'painless'. Well ALL surgeries performed under GA (before the patient wakes up) are painless.
The main thing that is unique to Sailer is SUBTERFUGE; the act of using duplicity to decieve. Here by appropriating the term 'face lift', slapping the prefix of 'reverse' to it and NOT making CLEAR the main method is MAXFAX surgery. Given that the average person seeking out a FACE LIFT is not specifically seeking out a laundry list of BONE CUTTING and facial implant surgeries and he WITHHOLDS--omits to make clear the laundry list of procedures which are NOT 'face lift' techniques, it's SUBTERFUGE.
TBH, the mods here at JSF are not impressed with this type of marketing and we find mention of him somewhat of a board burden because then we have to end up disclosing what he doesn't. Let me put it this way, if Sailer didn't purposely makes UNCLEAR every procedure that woman got and didn't attempt to deceive by using the term 'face lift', you would not have had this question, nor would this site been 'graced' by a link to bulls**t way of marketing.