How do you think CCW-r would be done without knowing what his gum show is like? On that note, aren’t there only a handful of surgeons in the US who do CCW-r via downgrafting if tooth/ gum show is already good?
I’m just wondering if it’s obvious a surgeon would do CCW-r with a flat occlusal plane. I’m not even sure the top surgeons will do this if the OP is flat. Am I wrong ?
Not sure if I understand the questions. There are many variables in a displacement diagram. Ccw rotation only tells the direction of the rotation, gum show is addressed either by anterior impaction or downgrafting depending on what to achieve. Rotation by posterior down grating have less impact on tooth show and with a combination of anterior and posterior adjustments you can control the tooth show.
I don't know what fraction of surgeons that do posterior down grafting. I thought 3 part lefort was uncommon as well, but after looking into a Facebook group it seems like every other patient is having it. I can say like this, going in for a bimax surgery with only aesthetic in mind, I would pick surgeon very carefully. It's high stakes and the expectations are high.
No, nothing is obvious, and different surgeons may suggest different procedures. The bite is solid as it is, which would resolve to Kavans "Dont touch it". There are always tradeoffs any way you handle it.
The chin is more retruded than the maxilla, and the upper incisors could benefit from being tipped out a bit and it would also support the upper lip a bit to meet the subnasal TVL. A ccw rotation would address this. I'm not sure how to measure the OP, but after rotating the ceph in FH orientation, it's not horizontal. I think this is the most common way to rotate the skull when planning, some surgeons even rotate it a bit further. The displacement diagrams I've seen normally seem to allow ccw rotation until the OP I horizontal in FH orientation, which would allow ccw rotation in this case.
I've been cautious in my own case about rotation as I have an excessive curve of speed and to me it seems hard to not get the OP over rotated with ccw rotation. But as I have multiple opinions supporting it, it seems legit. And also it's always a trade. Do you want the chin projected in a way ccw rotation allow, or less rotation of the OP? You can't have both. The thread is very vague with no real question, so we're basically guessing. But it seems clear that advancement is the priority to the aesthetic concerns.